抄袭因抄袭问题论文而被撤稿的论文的论文,不用撤稿?
海归学者发起的公益学术平台
分享信息,整合资源
交流学术,偶尔风月
4月14日,撤稿观察,即Retraction Watch,发布了一条有趣的消息:
简言之,抄袭因抄袭问题论文而被撤稿的论文的论文,没被撤稿。
The Editors-in-Chief would like to alert readers that there are some concerns related to this article [1]. Concern has been raised that there are textual and formatting similarities to this retracted article [2].
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention has retracted the article titled “siRNA mediated silencing of NIN1/RPN12 binding protein 1 homolog inhibits proliferation and growth of breast cancer cells”(1) for reason of similarity with a series of articles identified by Byrne and Labbé (2).
We identified 48 examples of highly similar papers describing single gene knockdowns in 1–2 human cancer cell lines that were all published by investigators from China. The incorrect use of a particular TPD52L2 shRNA sequence as a negative or non-targeting control was identified in 30/48 (63%) of these publications... Overall, these results suggest that some publications describing the effects of single gene knockdowns in human cancer cell lines may include the results of experiments that were not performed by the authors. This has serious implications for the validity of such results, and for their application in future research.
A论文被Byrne and Labbé发现存在问题;
B与A存在相似,被撤稿;
C与B存在相似,被表达关切。
据称,C的作者们没有对关切表达做出回应。
点击下方知社人才广场,查看最新学术招聘
扩展阅读
本文系网易新闻·网易号“各有态度”特色内容
媒体转载联系授权请看下方